Comparative analysis of the RiC and NEDA conceptual models for archival description

Authors

  • Marcos Vinicius Bittencourt de Souza Universidad de Salamanca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54886/scire.v26i2.4697

Keywords:

Conceptual model, Archival description, Records in Context, NEDA-MC, Data interchange

Abstract

The spanish conceptual model for archival description (NEDA) and the new proposed standard Records in Context (RiC) are analyzed, seeking to identify common points and equivalences among their entities that may help future migrations of descriptions and data interchange.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-07

How to Cite

Bittencourt de Souza, M. V. (2020). Comparative analysis of the RiC and NEDA conceptual models for archival description. Scire: Knowledge Representation and Organization (ISSNe 2340-7042; ISSN 1135-3716), 26(2), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.54886/scire.v26i2.4697

Issue

Vol. 26 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Authors retain their copyright, but transfer the exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication and transformation) to the journal in a non-exclusive way and guarantee the right to the first publication of their work to the journal, which will be simultaneously subjected to the license CC BY-NC-ND. Authors take whole personal responsibility on fulfilling all the appropiate ethical codes and laws, and obtaining all the necessary copyright permissions regarding their articles. Institutional and self- archiving is allowed and encouraged.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© 1996- . Authors retain their copyright, but transfer the exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication and transformation) to the journal in a non-exclusive way and guarantee the right to the first publication of their work to the journal, which will be simultaneously subjected to the license CC BY-NC-ND. Authors take whole personal responsibility on fulfilling all the appropiate ethical codes and laws, and obtaining all the necessary copyright permissions regarding their articles. Institutional and self- archiving is allowed and encouraged.