Guidelines for KOS compatibility towards intelligent information retrieval
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54886/scire.v28i2.4808Keywords:
Knowledge organization systems, Semantic interoperability, Intermediate language, Semantic coordinates, Information retrieval, Semantic webAbstract
An approach to the compatibilization of heterogeneous vocabularies is presented aiming to allow the intelligent retrieval of information in different databases, ensuring that the original vocabularies are kept without change. This study is characterized by a qualitative approach that supposes an interpretative development of data collected from bibliographic and documentary research. As a product of this research, a set of guidelines is presented that, supported by methods, techniques, and computational algorithms, points to the possibility of creating automated processes of semantic compatibilization of vocabularies that may lead to an intelligent process of retrieval of information distributed in different KOS.
Downloads
References
Achichi, M. et al.(2017). Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2017. Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative Conference. Viena.
Agraev, V. A. et al.(1974). Information retrieval system compati-bility. // Automation Documentation and Mathematical Lin-guistics. 2, 29-37.
Algergawy, A. et al.(2018). Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2018. Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative Conference. Monterey.
Algergawy, A. et al.(2019). Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2019. Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative Conference. Auckland.
Angermann, H.; Ramzan, N. (2017). Taxonomy Matching Using Background Knowledge: Linked Data, Semantic Web and Heterogeneous Repositories. Springer International Publish-ing.
Bailey, D. (2004). An efficient euclidean distance transform. Proceedings of the 11th International Semantic Web Confer-ence. Berlin, Germany: Springer. 394-408.
Barbosa, N. T. (2021). Para uma economia da informação semântica: a construção de ambientes semânticos para a recuperação inteligente da Informação. Rio de Janeiro: Uni-versidade Federal Fluminense. Tese de doutorado.
Bocatto, V. R. C.; Torquetti, M. C. (2012). Interoperabilidade entre linguagens de indexação. // Informação & Informação. Londrina. 17:3, 76-101.
Boleda, G. (2020). Distributional Semantics and Linguistic Theory. // Annual Review of Linguistics. 6, 213-234.
Campos, M. L. A.; Campos, M. L. M.; Davila, A. M. R.; Gomes, H. E.; Campos, L. M.; Lira, L. (2009). Aspectos Metodológi-cos no Reúso de Ontologias: um estudo a partir das anota-ções genômicas no domínio dos tripanosomatídeos. // RE-CIIS. Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde. 3, 64-75.
Cheatham, M.; Hitzler, P. (2013). String similarity metrics for ontology alignment. International Semantic Web Conference ISWC 2013. Heidelberg: Springer. 294–309.
Coates, E. J. (1970). Switching languages for indexing. // Journal of Documentation. London. 26:2, 102-110.
Dahlberg, I. (1981). Towards establishment of compatibility between indexing languages. // International Classification. 8:2, 88-91.
Euzenat, J.; Shvaiko, P. (2013). Ontology Matching, 2 ed. Hei-delberg: Springer.
Gantz, J.; Reinsel D. (2010). The digital universe decade - are you ready? IDC White Paper. May.
Gardin, J. C. (1967). Recherches sur l'indexation automatique des documents scientifiques. // Revue d'informatique et de recherche opérationnelle. 1:6, 27-46.
Gardin, J. C. (1973). Document analysis and linguistic theory. // Journal of Documentation. London. 29:2, 137-68.
Gardin, N. (1969). Le lexique intermédiaire: un nouveau pas vers la cooperation internationale dans le domaine de l´information scientifique et technique. // Bulletin de l'UNESCO: à l' Intention des bibliothèques. Paris. 23:2, 66-71.
Goldberg, Y. (2017). Neural Network Methods for Natural Language Processing. Synthesis Lectures on Human Lan-guage Technologies.
Hamming, R. W. (1950). Error detecting and error correcting codes. // Bell System Technical Journal. 29:2, 147-160.
Hammond, W; Rosenborg, S. (1962). Experimental study of convertibility between large technical indexing vocabularies. // Technical report IR-1. Datacontrol Corporation. Silver Spring. Ago.
Henderson, M. M. et al.(1966). Cooperation, Convertibility, Compatibility Among Information Systems: A Literature Re-view. // National Bureau of Standards. Jan.
Horsnell, V. (1975). The Intermediate Lexicon: an aid to interna-tional co-operation. // Aslib Proceedings. 27:2, 57-66.
Jones, K. S. (1972). A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. // Journal of Documentation. 28:11, 21.
Kernighan, B.; Lin, S. (1970). An efficient heuristic procedure for partitioning graphs. // Bell System Technical Journal. Blackwell Publishing. 49, 291.
Levenshtein, W. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. // Soviet Physics Dokla-dy. Springer. 10, 707–710.
Lévy, P. (2014). A Esfera Semântica. Tomo 1: Computação, cognição, economia da informação. Editora Annablume.
Lévy, P. (2009). From Social Computing to Reflexive Collective intelligence: The IEML Research Program. CRC, FRSC, University of Ottawa.
Lévy, P. (2019). IEML - A metalinguagem da Economia da Informação - Livro Branco. Pré-print, não publicado.
Newman, S. M. ed. (1965). Information Systems compatibility. Washington: Spartan Books.
Nurcan, S. et al.(1999). Change process modeling using the EKD – Change Management Method. 7th European Confer-ence on Information Systems, ECIS’ 99. Copenhagen, Denmark. 513-529.
Otero-Cerdeira, L.; Rodríguez-Martínez, F. J.; Gómez-Rodriguez, A. (2015). Ontology matching: a literature re-view. // Expert Systems with Applications. 42, 949.
Smith, L. C. (1974). Systematic searching of abstracts and indexes in interdisciplinary areas. // American Society of In-formation Science. 25, 343-353.
Soergel, D. (1972). A universal source thesaurus as a classifi-cation generator. // Journal of the American Society for In-formation Science. 23:5, 299-305.
Soergel, D. (1974). Indexing languages and thesauri: Construc-tion and maintenance. Los Angeles, CA: Melville Wiley In-formation Science Series.
Statista (2021). Amount of data created, consumed, and stored 2010-2020, with forecasts to 2025. // Statista Research De-partment. https://www.statista.com/statistics/871513/worldwide-data-created/ (2022-03-01).
Svenonius, E. (1975). Translation between hierarchical struc-tures: an exercise in abstract classification. Ordering sys-tems for global information networks. 204-211.
Tan, P. N.; Steinbach, M.; Kumar, V. (2005). Introduction to data mining. 1st. ed. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Long-man Publishing Co., Inc.
Tanenbaum, Andrew S. (2003). Redes de Computadores. 4ª Edição. Editora Elsevier.
Unesco (1971). Unisist study report on the feasibility of a world science information system. Paris.
Wellisch, H. (1972). A concordance between UDC and Thesau-rus of engineering and scientific terms. Proceedings of the International Symposium UDC in Relation to Other Indexing Languages. Novi, Yugoslavia.
Wersig, G. (1975). Experiences in compatibility research in documentary languages: Ordering systems for global infor-mation networks. 423-430.
Wu, Z.; Palmer, M. (1994). Verbs semantics and lexical selec-tion. 32nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACM). New Mexico. 133-138.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Authors retain their copyright, but transfer the exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication and transformation) to the journal in a non-exclusive way and guarantee the right to the first publication of their work to the journal, which will be simultaneously subjected to the license CC BY-NC-ND. Authors take whole personal responsibility on fulfilling all the appropiate ethical codes and laws, and obtaining all the necessary copyright permissions regarding their articles. Institutional and self- archiving is allowed and encouraged.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© 1996- . Authors retain their copyright, but transfer the exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication and transformation) to the journal in a non-exclusive way and guarantee the right to the first publication of their work to the journal, which will be simultaneously subjected to the license CC BY-NC-ND. Authors take whole personal responsibility on fulfilling all the appropiate ethical codes and laws, and obtaining all the necessary copyright permissions regarding their articles. Institutional and self- archiving is allowed and encouraged.
