A note on the theory and practice of knowledge organization and knowledge representation

Authors

  • Alan Duncan Gilchrist Cura Consortium

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54886/scire.v17i1.3920

Keywords:

Knowledge representation, Knowledge organization, Information retrieval, Interdisciplinarity, Evaluation,

Abstract

It is argued that because knowledge is abstract and every person has a unique perception of his environment and the properties and behaviour of its components, it follows that those people engaged in Knowledge Organization and Knowledge Representation must base their work on physical records, which we may call carriers of information, or messages. The products based on analysis of these messages can then be considered as models of knowledge. Models are created in order to reduce complexity and to gain a clearer understanding of aspects of the world around us, but they must be continuously tested and revised in a working environment. The testing of the products of Knowledge Organization is often carried out by information scientists in their provision of information retrieval, whereas while the products of Knowledge Representation also rely on Knowledge Organization, they may be considered, to some extent, to be self-testing. It follows that much can be gained by a closer collaboration between those engaged in Knowledge Organization, Knowledge Representation and those engaged in delivering information to end users.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2012-06-03

How to Cite

Gilchrist, A. D. (2012). A note on the theory and practice of knowledge organization and knowledge representation. Scire: Knowledge Representation and Organization (ISSNe 2340-7042; ISSN 1135-3716), 17(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.54886/scire.v17i1.3920

Issue

Section

Articles